After the negotiation period, the parties agreed to arrange the next hearing to take place at 09:30 on January 16 (local time), or 05h30 according to Vietnam time. Here, Djokovic's lawyer will argue with the main view that the Australian government has “made a wrong decision”.
At the beginning of the week, Djokovic also apologized after admitting that his support team “marked inaccurate boxes” on entry documents. The 34 -year -old player added that it was “human fault but not intentional”.
Meanwhile this morning, a 20 -minute hearing took place to decide to see if there was one or 3 judges to run the trial in the morning. And of course Djokovic wants the most beneficial choices for himself.
His lawyer, Paul Holdenson said: “I think three judges are appropriate.” This is because if there are three judges, Immigration Minister Alex Hawke will not have the right to appeal to any court decision.
Mr. O'Callaghan, a judge of the hearing this morning, said he would make a decision about having 1 or 3 judges today.
Paul Holdenson is a lawyer representing Djokovic in the hearing this morning. It is not clear who will be the one who protects the rights of Djokovic in the trial of tomorrow morning.
But for anyone else, Djokovic's chances of victory are still not bright. Because at this time, the Australian government is still determined to protect the decision to cancel Djokovic's visa. Both Australian Prime Minister and Minister Hawke agreed with the view that Djokovic needs to be expelled to “protect the rights of Australian people”.
The fact that up to 83% of the respondents also agreed with the ban on Djokovic. According to Australian media, the Minister's personal decision is often difficult to be reversed in court.
Meanwhile, the Serbia side of course condemned. The Serbian Tennis Federation describes the Australian decision “choking politics”. Meanwhile, the politicians of Serbia are also very harsh with the decision to turn away from their world's No. 1 player.
